Week 14 (5/11/04 & 5/13/04)
RETURN PAPER #2
- I tried to be as fair as possible by sticking to the posted criteria. The following codes were used to judge criteria: star = excellent,
check = good, � = fair, � = poor. The grade on the paper was a
weighted average of criteria components.
- The most serious problem was failure to address the central thesis of the
paper, which was to 'examine why a health issue is more of a
problem in a particular community at risk compared to others'
(HS1 Syllabus, 2004, p. 5).
PLAN FOR COMPLETION OF SEMESTER
[handout]
CHAP13 REVIEW QUESTIONS will be covered
in class
Review Questions for Learning
Objectives and General Topics from Earlier in Semester -- will be
covered in class on Th and next Tuesday
HW (due