Poor	Acceptable	Good	Excellent
1. Problem Definition	Unclear. Does not describe the practical applications and importance of the problem. Does not provide any evidence or understanding of current literature. Is not technically relevant. Does not integrate principles from all courses involved. Does not address any contemporary societal issues.	Clear. Describes the practical applications and importance of the problem. Refers to current literature (3+ references). Somewhat technically relevant. Somewhat interesting. Integrates principles from all courses involved. Addresses contemporary societal issues.	Clear. Describes the practical applications and importance of the problem. Refers to and demonstrates understanding of current literature (3+ references). Technically relevant. Interesting. Integrates principles from all courses involved. Addresses contemporary global / societal issues.	Very clear. Describes the practical applications and importance of the problem. Refers to and demonstrates understanding of current literature (5+ references). Technically relevant. Very interesting and new. Integrates principles from all courses involved. Addresses important contemporary global / societal issues.
2. Project Objectives	No objectives. Unclear objectives Not written in technical terms Not addressing each and every area (aero, structures, flight mechanics, etc.) integrated in the project.	Written in technical terms. Address each and every area (aero, structures, flight mechanics, etc.) to be integrated in the project.	Clear. Written in technical terms. Address each and every area (aero, structures, flight mechanics, etc.) to be integrated in the project.	Very clear. Written in concise, technical terms. Address each and every area (aero, structures, flight mechanics, etc.) to be integrated in the project.
3. Multidisciplinary Analysis	No assumptions listed. Incorrect modeling. Superficial or incorrect analysis in one or more areas. No use of modern tools.	Some assumptions listed. Correct modeling. Correct analysis in each area. Use of modern tools in some areas.	Appropriate assumptions listed. Correct modeling. In-depth analysis in each area. Use of modern tools in some areas.	All appropriate assumptions listed. Correct modeling. In-depth analysis in each area. Use of modern tools in all areas.
4. Results	Poor quality graphs and tables. Numbers and trends do not make sense. Results do not agree with published data.	Graphs and tables are prepared following standard guidelines. Some of the results make sense Some agree with published data.	Good quality graphs and tables. Numbers and trends make sense. Results agree well with published data.	Excellent quality graphs and tables in all areas. Numbers and trends make sense in all areas. Results agree very well with published data.
5. Discussion	No understanding of the results is evident in one or more subjects.	Some understanding of the results is evident in most subjects.	A good understanding of the results is evident in most subjects.	An excellent understanding of the results is evident in all subjects.
6. Evaluation and Reflection	Superficial or no evaluation of the results. No reflection on the assumptions made to model the problem. No understanding of the impact of the solution in a practical, global / societal context is evident.	Some evaluation of the results. Some comments on the assumptions made to model the problem. Some understanding of the impact of the solution in a practical, global / societal context.	Good evaluation of the results. Reflection on the assumptions made to model the problem. Good understanding of the impact of the solution in a practical, global / societal context.	Excellent evaluation of the results. Appropriate reflection on the assumptions made to model the problem. Excellent understanding of the impact of the solution in a practical, global / societal context.