Chap 7 Grading Key

Assigned 2/23 Due 3/2 Returned 3/9 
[Point number - total: 10 point assignment]

7.4 GRADING KEY
(A) Calculate the crude mortality rate in this state. (Use a population multiplier of 100,000.) Compare this crude rate in this population to that of Florida. 
[1] Crude rate for state X (cRStateX) = 15,984 / 2,450,000 � 100,000 = 652
[2] The crude rate in Florida is much higher (cRFlorida = 1026)

(B) Calculate age-specific death rates in the fictitious state. (Use a population multiplier of 100,000 throughout this problem.) Compare these to Florida's . . 
[3] For age-specific rates 

Age Rate (per 100,000) 
0 - 4 238
5 -24 64
25 - 44 208
45 - 64 809
65 - 74 2221
75+ 6887

[4] Compare these to Florida's . . . The age-specific rates in the states are identical.

(C) Results to this point may appear paradoxical, but are easily explained. Explain. 
[5] Florida is the older state. For example, in Florida, 1,038,000 of the 13,278,000 (11.9%) are over 75. In the fictitious state, 100,000 of 2,450,000 (4.1%) of the people are over 75. 


(D) Using the standard million reported in Table 7.3 (p. 145) as the reference population, adjust the fictitious state's death rate using the direct method.

Age Fictitious state Standard Million (Ni) Product  (Niri
0 - 4 238 76158 18125604
5 -24 64 286501 18336064
25 - 44 208 325971 67801968
45 - 64 809 185402 149990218
65 - 74 2221 72494 161009174
75+ 6887 53474 368275438

[6] One point for the last column in the above table
[7] One point for the sum of the products (SNiri) = 18125604 + 18336064 + . . . + 368275438 = 783538466
[8]  One point for the adjusted rate (aRStateX) = 783538466 / 1000000 @ 784

(E) Discuss your findings; compare the fictitious state's age-adjusted death rate to Florida's (Table 7.8, p. 147). 
[9] Age-adjusted rates are the same. (This is because the adjusted rate compensates for age differences.)
[10] Free point