Review Questions for Chapter 8
- This term refers to the explanatory variable in an
epidemiological study.
- This term refers to the response or outcome variable.
- [T/F?] "Measure of association" and
"measure of effect" are often used interchangeably in
epidemiology.
- What does it mean when we say there is a positive
association between an exposure and disease? What does it mean when we say
there is a negative association?
- [T/F?] Associations equals causation.
- [T/F?] Absolute comparisons are made by division.
- [T/F?] Relative comparisons are made by
division.
- When I say, "there will be 5 additional cases per 1000 exposures,"
am I referring to an RR, RD, AFe, or AFp?
- When I say, "the exposure doubles risk," am
I referring to an RR, RD, AFe, or AFp?
- This epidemiologic measure quantifies the effect of
the exposure in absolute terms.
- This epidemiologic measure quantifies the effect of
an exposure in relative terms.
- An exposed group has a risk of 50% and a non-exposed
group has a risk of 35%. Calculate and interpret the RD associated with
this exposure.
- Same data as prior question: calculate and interpret
the RR?
- A report states "people who do not wear seat
belts are eight times as likely to die in an automobile accident." Is
this statistic an incidence attributable fraction, relative risk, or risk
difference?
- The one-year risk in an exposed group is 15 per 1000.
The one-year risk of disease in a non-exposed is 10 per 1000. Would it be
correct say that the exposure increases risk by 150%? Explain your
reasoning.
- An RR of 1.4 suggests risk increases in relative terms by ______%
with exposure.
- [T/F] A RR
of 0.7 indicates a positive association between the exposure and
disease.
- [T/F] A
RD of 0.7 per 100 indicates a positive
association between the exposure and disease.
- What is the baseline RD, i.e., the RD that indicates no additional
risk with exposure, or “no association” between the exposure
and disease?
- What happens to the RD when we redefine
the exposed group as non-exposed, and and vice versa?
- What does a rate difference of �54.3 per 10,000
person-years mean in plain terms?
- What is the "baseline" relative risk, i.e.,
the relative risk that indicates no additional risk associated with
exposure?
- What happens to the numeric value of the RR if
we switch designation of the exposed group as non-exposed, and vice
versa?
- A risk ratio is 1.85. How much does the exposure increase
risk in relative terms?
- This statistic quantifies the proportion of cases
that would be averted had the exposure been absent in exposed cases.
- This statistic quantifies the proportion of cases
that would be averted if the exposure had been absent in the
population.
- How can the sum of attributable fractions associated with
multiple exposures exceed 100%?
- Explain how AFp
and AFe differ.
- Matching these terms with their brief
description.
Terms: RR, RD, AF
Descriptions: (a)
quantifies effect of the exposure in absolute terms (b) quantifies
effect of the exposure in relative terms (c) quantifies proportion
of cases that would be averted with removal of the exposure from a group
Key
Last edit: 06/07/2009